Home » Software

VPN Loading Balancing

2 January 2008 0 views No Comment

Private Networks form a major part of many organizations’ network infrastructure. They are often used as a vehicle to serve sensitive information to remote offices and workers. Typically VPN’s are created point-to-point making it difficult to add any resilience or more . Introducing our products to this infrastructure makes this possible, whether you are implementing new or expanding existing VPN infrastructure.

Drawbacks of existing technology:
Single Point of Failure
Traditional VPN’s both client and -to- are based upon a single link. Should this link fail, organizations invariably have no fall-back plan, and simply have to diagnose, report and wait.

Difficult to Scale
Should an organization require more to accommodate increasing demand, this is often proves difficult and is some cases impossible. This could mean expensive upgrades, change of and most likely their complete infrastructure.

Restricted Upload Speed of DSL connections
SME’s generally use DSL to serve their VPN connections. This can cause considerable bottlenecks and can prevent service being offered to clients should demand outgrow the supply.
Difficult to Priorities Critical Data
Maintaining a single link increases the chance that intensive services can saturate the entire amount of and this can lead to loss of data and denial of important transmissions such as E- and Web Services. Introducing a Load Balancing device into the network makes it possible segregate and route based on priority. Furthermore all our Load Balancing products such of Service (QoS) which can be used to limit these intensive applications in order to guarantee the arability to the critical ones.

Distribution and Failover:
distribution is done “by packet” and so a single data connection can assume all the available . This could be a Voice Over IP call over Teleconferencing.

Should any active links fail, data is simply retransmitted down available links with no impact to the client.

distribution is done “by connection”, so protocol’s that use multiple connections (such as HTTP) have greater benefit with this method.

On link failure connections related to the failed link will be lost, however most applications will retry the connection, in which case the Load Balancer will route the new connection down an available link

Article : http://www.articlerich.com

Mark Henry is the author related to Link Aggregation & Resilience, Management, Link Bonding, Multihoming, Load Balancer, Dual Port , Multiple Gateways, Load BalancingXrio provide solutions for management, load balancing, link bonding, load balancing, multiple gateways, global management, , performance, , adsl, sdsl, dual port , high rout

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.